<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Value A Website For Sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketing-tools-review.com/blog/2008/08/how-to-value-a-website-for-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketing-tools-review.com/blog/2008/08/how-to-value-a-website-for-sale/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and information entrepreneurs - tools, news and tips to help you succeed</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-tools-review.com/blog/2008/08/how-to-value-a-website-for-sale/#comment-75661</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-tools-review.com/blog/?p=1242#comment-75661</guid>
		<description>You should also consider websitefact.com ; they provide a nice summary of the website performance. I find their WF rank being more accurate than Alexa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should also consider websitefact.com ; they provide a nice summary of the website performance. I find their WF rank being more accurate than Alexa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
